The Lord Advocate's dual role is increasingly contested.
The Lord Advocate's dual role as head of the prosecution service and chief legal adviser to the Scottish Government is a distinctive feature of Scotland's constitutional framework, rooted in historical precedent but increasingly contested. This essay critically examines the legal, constitutional, and political dimensions of this dual role, exploring arguments for and against reform. It assesses the political momentum behind calls for change and the practical and legal constraints imposed by the Scotland Act 1998. While complete structural reform would require UK parliamentary approval, more limited functional separations within the current framework appear feasible. The essay concludes that any reform must carefully balance the need for enhanced independence and transparency against preserving coherence, accountability, and the rule of law. Ultimately, it questions whether the existing model remains fit for purpose in a modern, devolved constitutional order.